unfair comparison of two 16 core processors...
lets go
Spacemit k3:
8X X100 (2 clusters), X100 > Specint2K6/ghz of 9.0 (this is so funny), X100 supports the latest features, double pumped 256b vectors (compare: gracemont), Up to 2.5 GHZ...
8XA100 ("AI cores"), 15 TOPS inbuilt NPU, Based on older X60 architecture > Specint2K6/GHZ of 5.0, not accessible in normal usage, Only for AI CORES!!!, BIIIIIIIG VECTORS, 1024B VECTORS, 2X256B FMA (INTEL, YOU MUST LISTEN TO THIS, X9 388H, THEY ARE CATCHING UP!!). 2.0 Gjz..... because GJZ IS OUR SURVIVOR
CACHE: 4MBX2 (X100)+1MB X2 (A100) (again, gracemont would like to have a talk, its so funny)
X9 388H:
Cluster 1 4X coigar Cove (4 cores), Intels latest specint2k6 architecture, > 2.2 specint 2K17/ghz, > 18 specint2K6GHz* (listen up, X100? you thought HIGH PERFORMANCE means catching up to A76? LOLOLLLLL) , P cores, born from lion cove, node shrink of lion cove., 5.1 Ghz
8X Darkmont, node shrink of skymont. , 3.8 GHz
4x Lpe, which is going to still be more powerful than 8X X100 combined. LollllllUlz... 3.7 Gjz...
CACHE: 18M+3M * 4(L2)+4M*3(L2)
UNDOUBTEDLY THE K3 WINS. IN EVERY SINGLE THING. IF YOU WERE COMPARING BIIIIIG VECTORS, THAT IS.
* pretty sure if you used intel cheesemaxxing compilerz then it can get > 22 Specint2K6/GHZ. Just for lulz...
and we don't talk about the Arc B3XX (ceensored) GPU. It's not a fair contest to compare that to the greatest matrix engine ever.
as such i've collected some more details... looks like 4 engines that can do 8x16x8 matrix multiplications in A100... we'll wait for the next generation with X86's ACE to "compete" with this.
(compete? well... AMX is already 16c/52c for a full 16x64x16 matrix multiplication. Its so unfunny that I, X86 himself, would consider competing to something that's obviously miles superior....)
Bình luận
turns out big vectors are all for show and feeding the matmul units (amx's register size still far outclass this)
oof! so many typos...