as i have come to ts conclusion...
lets fight
on the left side
it's the greatest cpu money can buy
Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9282 Processor core ultra X9 388H ultra whatever i don't care. SHUT UP
right side
its the new one in town, jsut wake up
rockchip... (?) rk3688 12-core
last time we decided to do a quick "Comparison" of X9 388h vs spacemit k3... you know how that went. so time to get something that's at least competent...
focusing on the memory side first. rk3688 comes out on top with lpddr6, but is equally sided if lp5 was used. i don't have high hopes for latency and cpu bandwidth though.
gpu: as this is the least competent part of the x9 388h, i'll pass. OH WAIT, You remember who I am right? XJXIIJWIEIQJIJJ!OFOOADR!! OF COURSE IM GONNA MAKE USELESS COMPARISONS... LETS GO BOISSS
x9 388 Gpu: mali magni >2.0 TFLOPS
Rk36XX GPU: INTEL ARC BXXX > 7.0 TFLOPS
RK36XX is straight up mogmaxxing x9 388 in raw compute alone and it can even play games... how wonderful
Lets focus on the main party: the cpu.
cpu demonstration table is down below.
| Core | X9 3838588248219321499533124759132H | Rockchjp RK36294994192491532042032425 | Rockchjp RK36294994192491532042032405 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra performance mogmaxxing cores | 4X coigar Cove (4 cores), Intels latest specint2k6 architecture, > 2.2 specint 2K17/ghz, > 18 specint2K6GHz* (listen up, A730? you thought HIGH PERFORMANCE means catching up to Cortex-X2? LOLOLLLLL, you're still stuck in ancient clock speeds ) , P cores, born from lion cove, node shrink of lion cove., 5.1 Ghz | can't even add a c0rtex-x967 core just for the sake of it!!! why, rockcjp? you're getting absolutely outmogged by 3838588248219321499533124759132H... just do it rockchjp i don't believe in you. now get out | as this is the low end chip, i don't mind them. WRONG. DEAD WRONG. ONE SHOULD HAVE A C0RTEX X4. GET OUT. |
| Low performance efficiency cores | 4X darkmont lpe, node shrink of skymont. easily mogmaxxes the rk36294994192491532042032425 everyday... | 4x c1 nano/a530, arms latest e-waste architecture, > 0.8 specint 2K17/ghz, > 4 specint2K6GHz* (arm should be ASHAMED of selling this in the BIG 27) , up to 2.XX Ghz | 6X c1 nano/a530, arms latest e-waste architecture, > 0.8 specint 2K17/ghz, > 4 specint2K6GHz* (arm should be ASHAMED of selling this in the BIG 27) , up to 2.XX Ghz. R0CKCJP SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF SPAMMING SIX OF THESE E-WASTE CORES AS SOME FORM OF ANNOYANCE IN THEIR LATEST PRODUCTS. SHOWS HOW THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE A5X LINES NEVER ENDED, THEY'RE JUST PUTTING A7X for SMOKES AND CAN'T BE COMPETENT ENOUGH TO PUT AN X-c0RE. |
| efficiency cores | 8X Darkmont, node shrink of skymont. , 3.8 GHz,Intels latest e-waste architecture, > 2.0 specint 2K17/ghz, > 16 specint2K6GHz*, new intels atom architecture, rk36XX gonna be watching... | 8X cortex a730/c1 pro/ whatever inconsistent arm naming they just invented 10 seconds ago (8 cores), arms latest e-core architecture, > 2.2 specint 2K17/ghz, > 18 specint2K6GHz* (SHUT UP, INTEL!!! YOU ARE NOT INVITED TO THE PARTY) , up to 3.XX Ghz (reclassified since this intels e core levels cores and not p, sorry rockcjp) | 4X cortex a730/c1 pro/ whatever inconsistent arm naming they just invented 10 seconds ago (4 cores), arms latest e-core architecture, > 2.2 specint 2K17/ghz, > 18 specint2K6GHz* (SHUT UP, INTEL!!! YOU ARE NOT INVITED TO THE PARTY) , up to 3.XX Ghz (rockcjp is in 2022 with these technologies...) |
tbh rockcjp is producing these on like tsmc n6 so its a l for them... intels got a muh better node...
conclusion: dpendeds on your choce. if you want an arm sbc, maybe the RK36294994192491532042032425 is the choice that you may love. lol. x9 3838588248219321499533124759132h might not be even for you if you demand absolute mt performance. try something else like 270k or threadripper. good bye...
Bình luận
yet another nonsensical comparison by yoshi_likes_qdrt_decomp... shut up